| Heading: |
Aviation: Alternative Fuels |
| Question ID: |
1820807 |
| UIN: |
66031 |
| House: |
Commons |
| Date tabled: |
2025-07-08 |
| Asking Member ID: |
5179 |
| Asking Member display name: |
Kirsteen Sullivan
|
| Asking Member handle: |
@kittysull1
|
| Asking Member Twitter reference: |
@@kittysull1
|
| Member interest: |
false |
| Question text: |
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department plans to take steps to prevent aviation fuel suppliers from charging compliance risk premiums to mandated volumes of sustainable aviation fuel. |
| Is named day: |
true |
| Date of holding answer: |
|
| Date answered: |
2025-07-11 |
| Date answer corrected: |
|
| Is holding answer: |
false |
| Is correcting answer: |
false |
| Answering Member ID: |
4316 |
| Answering Member display name: |
Mike Kane
|
| Answering Member handle: |
MikeKaneMP
|
| Answering Member Twitter reference: |
@MikeKaneMP
|
| Correcting Member ID: |
|
| Correcting Member display name: |
|
| Correcting Member handle: |
|
| Correcting Member Twitter reference: |
|
| Answer text: |
We recognise that SAF is more expensive than jet fuel. This is why the Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) Mandate has been designed to protect against excessive costs. The SAF Mandate also has a built-in review process so the Government can take action to ch... |
| Original answer text: |
|
| Comparable answer text: |
|
| Answering body ID: |
27 |
| Answering body name: |
Department for Transport |
| Tweeted: |
true |