| Heading: |
Chronic Illnesses: Health Services |
| Question ID: |
1812238 |
| UIN: |
59560 |
| House: |
Commons |
| Date tabled: |
2025-06-12 |
| Asking Member ID: |
5201 |
| Asking Member display name: |
Victoria Collins
|
| Asking Member handle: |
TweetingCollins
|
| Asking Member Twitter reference: |
@TweetingCollins
|
| Member interest: |
false |
| Question text: |
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his Department has made of the difference in patient care outcomes between (a) assigning a named GP for accountability and (b) ensuring continuity of care through an own doctor syst |
| Is named day: |
false |
| Date of holding answer: |
|
| Date answered: |
2025-06-19 |
| Date answer corrected: |
|
| Is holding answer: |
false |
| Is correcting answer: |
false |
| Answering Member ID: |
4359 |
| Answering Member display name: |
Stephen Kinnock
|
| Answering Member handle: |
skinnock
|
| Answering Member Twitter reference: |
@skinnock
|
| Correcting Member ID: |
|
| Correcting Member display name: |
|
| Correcting Member handle: |
|
| Correcting Member Twitter reference: |
|
| Answer text: |
The Government is bringing back the family general practitioner (GP) because we know that continuity of care is essential to person-centred healthcare. While all patients have the legal right to choose their GP practice and must be assigned a named GP, th... |
| Original answer text: |
|
| Comparable answer text: |
|
| Answering body ID: |
17 |
| Answering body name: |
Department of Health and Social Care |
| Tweeted: |
true |