| Heading: |
Strategic Defence Review |
| Question ID: |
1808608 |
| UIN: |
56739 |
| House: |
Commons |
| Date tabled: |
2025-06-03 |
| Asking Member ID: |
1444 |
| Asking Member display name: |
Mr Mark Francois
|
| Asking Member handle: |
|
| Asking Member Twitter reference: |
Mr Mark Francois
|
| Member interest: |
false |
| Question text: |
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what criteria were used to determine which (a) peple and (b) companies were granted access to unredacted hard copies of the Strategic Defence Review on 2 June 2025. |
| Is named day: |
true |
| Date of holding answer: |
|
| Date answered: |
2025-06-11 |
| Date answer corrected: |
|
| Is holding answer: |
false |
| Is correcting answer: |
false |
| Answering Member ID: |
4682 |
| Answering Member display name: |
Luke Pollard
|
| Answering Member handle: |
LukePollard
|
| Answering Member Twitter reference: |
@LukePollard
|
| Correcting Member ID: |
|
| Correcting Member display name: |
|
| Correcting Member handle: |
|
| Correcting Member Twitter reference: |
|
| Answer text: |
For the launch of the Strategic Defence Review, the Government offered embargoed briefings to our people and senior defence leaders, plus certain Parliamentarians, trade unions, businesses, allies and media. This was broadly consistent with the approach f... |
| Original answer text: |
|
| Comparable answer text: |
|
| Answering body ID: |
11 |
| Answering body name: |
Ministry of Defence |
| Tweeted: |
true |