| Heading: |
Packaging: Recycling |
| Question ID: |
1788255 |
| UIN: |
41153 |
| House: |
Commons |
| Date tabled: |
2025-03-25 |
| Asking Member ID: |
4623 |
| Asking Member display name: |
Tonia Antoniazzi
|
| Asking Member handle: |
ToniaAntoniazzi
|
| Asking Member Twitter reference: |
@ToniaAntoniazzi
|
| Member interest: |
false |
| Question text: |
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether he plans to (a) review and (b) adjust extended producer responsibility fees to ensure they do not (i) adversely impact particular sectors and (ii) lead to unintended consequenc |
| Is named day: |
true |
| Date of holding answer: |
|
| Date answered: |
2025-04-03 |
| Date answer corrected: |
|
| Is holding answer: |
false |
| Is correcting answer: |
false |
| Answering Member ID: |
1579 |
| Answering Member display name: |
Mary Creagh
|
| Answering Member handle: |
marycreagh_
|
| Answering Member Twitter reference: |
@marycreagh_
|
| Correcting Member ID: |
|
| Correcting Member display name: |
|
| Correcting Member handle: |
|
| Correcting Member Twitter reference: |
|
| Answer text: |
Base fees for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) are designed to reflect the net waste management costs incurred by local authorities, with future fee modulation intended to encourage the recyclability of materials. This policy approach, established i... |
| Original answer text: |
|
| Comparable answer text: |
|
| Answering body ID: |
13 |
| Answering body name: |
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
| Tweeted: |
true |