| Heading: |
Housing: Construction |
| Question ID: |
1783150 |
| UIN: |
37216 |
| House: |
Commons |
| Date tabled: |
2025-03-11 |
| Asking Member ID: |
4474 |
| Asking Member display name: |
Kevin Hollinrake
|
| Asking Member handle: |
kevinhollinrake
|
| Asking Member Twitter reference: |
@kevinhollinrake
|
| Member interest: |
false |
| Question text: |
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the Answer of 21 February 2025 to Question 30440 on Housing: Construction, if he will make an assessment of the potential merits of enabling developers to meet biodiversity |
| Is named day: |
false |
| Date of holding answer: |
|
| Date answered: |
2025-03-25 |
| Date answer corrected: |
|
| Is holding answer: |
false |
| Is correcting answer: |
false |
| Answering Member ID: |
1579 |
| Answering Member display name: |
Mary Creagh
|
| Answering Member handle: |
marycreagh_
|
| Answering Member Twitter reference: |
@marycreagh_
|
| Correcting Member ID: |
|
| Correcting Member display name: |
|
| Correcting Member handle: |
|
| Correcting Member Twitter reference: |
|
| Answer text: |
The biodiversity gain hierarchy makes clear that a developer should first look to deliver their 10% BNG on-site. If they cannot achieve all or part of the 10% on-site, they must achieve the BNG off-site either on their own land, or by purchasing biodivers... |
| Original answer text: |
|
| Comparable answer text: |
|
| Answering body ID: |
13 |
| Answering body name: |
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
| Tweeted: |
true |