| Heading: |
Metals: Carbon Emissions |
| Question ID: |
1786274 |
| UIN: |
39564 |
| House: |
Commons |
| Date tabled: |
2025-03-19 |
| Asking Member ID: |
4716 |
| Asking Member display name: |
Ruth Jones
|
| Asking Member handle: |
RuthJonesLabour
|
| Asking Member Twitter reference: |
@RuthJonesLabour
|
| Member interest: |
false |
| Question text: |
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of differentiating the emissions associated between pre- and post-consumer scrap metal in the UK Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. |
| Is named day: |
true |
| Date of holding answer: |
|
| Date answered: |
2025-03-24 |
| Date answer corrected: |
|
| Is holding answer: |
false |
| Is correcting answer: |
false |
| Answering Member ID: |
4797 |
| Answering Member display name: |
James Murray
|
| Answering Member handle: |
jamesmurray_ldn
|
| Answering Member Twitter reference: |
@jamesmurray_ldn
|
| Correcting Member ID: |
|
| Correcting Member display name: |
|
| Correcting Member handle: |
|
| Correcting Member Twitter reference: |
|
| Answer text: |
As set out in our response to the consultation on the introduction of a carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), imported scrap products within the aluminum and iron & steel sectors will not be within scope of the CBAM, upon introduction from 1 Janu... |
| Original answer text: |
|
| Comparable answer text: |
|
| Answering body ID: |
14 |
| Answering body name: |
Treasury |
| Tweeted: |
true |